Swiss Legal Graph

Swiss law. Fully connected.

1.5 million nodes, almost 20 million relationships: the Jurata® Legal Agent considers not just individual sources, but always their full context.

Swiss Legal Graph
around
0.0M
nodes
almost
0M
relationships
Drag to rotate

Citation links

Where is a provision cited?

For every provision and every judgment, the graph knows the sources that refer to it. The Jurata Legal Agent retrieves these citation links during its research and finds the relevant case law – even when it uses different terms than your question.

Citations between statutes, judgments and decisions

References resolved down to paragraph and letter

Federal law and the law of all 26 cantons

Is a tram operator liable if a pedestrian looking at their phone steps onto the tracks?
Citation links
BGE 148 III 3434A_179/20214A_131/20214A_602/2018
Provision
Art. 40c EBG
DecisionProvision
Research

Course of proceedings

Which path has a judgment taken?

From the district court through the high court to the Federal Supreme Court: the graph links every judgment to its lower court and records how the proceedings ended. This lets the Jurata Legal Agent recognise which decisions were confirmed and which were set aside.

Course of proceedings · BGE 148 III 343
Art. 40c EBG
Challenged
District Court of Zurich
Partial judgment · 2 June 2020
Liability affirmed in principle
High Court ZH
NP200020
Judgment · 9 February 2021
Outcome: dismissed
Federal Supreme Court
4A_179/2021
Judgment · 20 May 2022
Outcome: upheld
Leading case
BGE 148 III 343
First Civil Law Division
Liability denied
Citation
published as
Lower court set aside
Lower court confirmed
Set aside
Edge typesCitationpublished asLower court confirmedLower court set aside
Course of proceedings · BGE 148 III 343
Art. 40c EBG
Citation
Leading case
BGE 148 III 343
First Civil Law Division
Liability denied
published as
Federal Supreme Court
4A_179/2021
Judgment · 20 May 2022
Outcome: upheld
Lower court set aside
High Court ZH
NP200020
Judgment · 9 February 2021
Outcome: dismissed
Set aside
Lower court confirmed
Challenged
District Court of Zurich
Partial judgment · 2 June 2020
Liability affirmed in principle
Provision
Art. 653s CO
Capital band
Practice on
FCRO · Practice note 2/23
Aktienrechtsrevision: bedingtes Kapital und Kapitalband
6 June 2023
FCRO · Practice note 1/25
Kapitalband und Opting-out bei Sitzverlegung und Umwandlung
7 April 2025
FCRO · Practice note 3/26
Bedingtes Kapital innerhalb und ausserhalb des Kapitalbands
27 August 2026

Authority practice

What practice exists on a provision?

Circulars, practice notes and directives show how authorities apply the law. In the graph, they are attached to the provisions they interpret – such as the practice notes of the Federal Commercial Registry Office on the capital band.

FINMA circulars and practice notes of the FCRO

Circulars of the FTA and cantonal tax administrations

Current status

Has a judgment since been set aside?

A decision set aside by the next instance cannot support an answer. The Jurata Legal Agent sees this in the graph before it answers, flags decisions that were set aside and backs its answer with the original passage.

Lower-court decisions set aside are flagged

Amended and repealed provisions are recognised

Every statement backed by the original passage and consideration

Citation links for Art. 40c EBG retrieved

No. Anyone who suddenly steps onto a tram track without making sure that no tram is approaching, because they are looking at a mobile phone, acts with gross negligence – the tram operator is released from liability.

BGE 148 III 343 · E. 4OGer ZH NP200020 set aside
BGE 148 III 343
4A_179/2021 vom 20. Mai 2022
Headnote

Art. 40b Abs. 1 EBG; Gefährdungshaftung nach Eisenbahngesetz; Art. 40c EBG; Entlastungsgründe.

Nach Art. 40c EBG wird der Inhaber eines Eisenbahnunternehmens von der Haftpflicht für den Schaden aus dem Betrieb der Eisenbahn entlastet, wenn ein Sachverhalt, der ihm nicht zugerechnet werden kann, so sehr zur Entstehung des Schadens beigetragen hat, dass er als dessen Hauptursache anzusehen ist (Abs. 1), insbesondere grobes Verschulden der geschädigten oder einer dritten Person (Abs. 2 lit. b) (E. 3.1).

Wer unvermittelt ein Tramtrassee betritt, ohne sich zu vergewissern, dass kein Tram herannaht, weil er seinen Blick auf ein Mobiltelefon richtet, handelt grob fahrlässig (E. 4). Haftung des Eisenbahnunternehmens verneint.

BGE 148 III 343 · Headnote
Swiss law
In the Swiss Legal Graph · DE · FR · IT
Federal law
Fedlex · enactments and articles
130,540articles
Cantonal law
Statute books of all 26 cantons
372,031articles
Federal Supreme Court · leading cases
BGE
24,427publications
Federal Supreme Court · judgments
All published judgments
178,295judgments
Other federal courts and authorities
FAC · FCC · FPC · administrative practice
162,375decisions
Cantonal courts
All 26 cantons
600,494decisions
Authority practice
Circulars · practice notes · directives
1,121documents

In the graph

More than statutes and judgments.

The Swiss Legal Graph covers federal law and the law of all 26 cantons, the case law of the Federal Supreme Court, the other federal courts and the cantonal courts as well as the practice of the authorities – in German, French and Italian.

Convince yourself.

Try for free for 7 days, no credit card required. Or see it in 20 minutes in the demo.