Comparison
Jurata® Legal Agent vs. Justement
Justement is a Zurich-based platform for legal research in Swiss law with the AI assistant Justement Assistant. This comparison covers data protection and professional secrecy, legal sources, answer validation, the individual features, and the support and organisational features of both providers. As of October 2026.
Third-party information is sourced from their public websites and documentation.
Data protection and professional secrecy
Criterion | Jurata® Legal Agent | Justement |
|---|---|---|
Data storage | Microsoft Azure in Switzerland, encrypted | In Switzerland on Google Cloud, encrypted |
Model inference (language models) | Microsoft Azure in Switzerland and the EU, never in the USA | In Switzerland or the EU, currently in the EU |
Subcontractors | Microsoft Azure is the only subcontractor that receives case and client data. | Google Cloud EMEA Ltd is the only directly engaged sub-processor for content data |
Training on your data | No, neither by Jurata nor by the LLM provider | No, neither by Justement nor by its cloud provider |
Legal opinion on professional secrecy | Legal opinion by Dr. iur. David Vasella (Walder Wyss): use, including with client data and without the client’s consent, complies with professional rules and data protection law (Art. 321 SCC, Art. 13 BGFA, FADP, GDPR) | No external legal opinion published on the website; own legal assessment and answers on the SAV guidelines |
Sign-in | Microsoft and Google Single Sign-on or email and password, in all plans | Google or Microsoft Single Sign-on or email and password, for all users |
Legal sources and citation graph
Criterion | Jurata® Legal Agent | Justement |
|---|---|---|
Case law | Over 960’000 decisions: federal, cantonal and administrative bodies | Around 935’000 decisions: federal, cantonal and administrative bodies, plus around 98’500 judgments of the European Court of Human Rights |
Cantonal law | Legislation of the Confederation and all 26 cantons | Legislation of the Confederation and all 26 cantons |
Citation graph | Interactive citation graph (Swiss Legal Graph, around 1.5 million nodes, almost 20 million relationships) in 2D or 3D; citations down to paragraph and letter | For every enactment and decision: what it cites and where it is cited, also for individual articles and sections; context network of similar decisions |
Appeal history and outcome | The citation graph links judgments to the lower instance and shows whether it was upheld, set aside or amended and how the proceedings ended | Not documented; published BGE decisions are linked to the unpublished Federal Supreme Court version of the same decision |
Web search | Integrated web search in addition to the legal sources | No integrated web search (deliberately not used, according to the provider) |
Answer validation
Criterion | Jurata® Legal Agent | Justement |
|---|---|---|
Answer validation | Automatically after every answer: each statement is checked against all cited original sources and shown as supported, partly supported or not supported | A click on a citation opens the cited passage; an automatic check of every answer is not documented |
Check of every citation | Automatically: each citation is assessed individually as supported, wrong pinpoint, no contribution to the statement or contradicting the statement | As a task or at the push of a button in a document: citations are checked at the source, with reasons for any issues (e.g. wrong pinpoint in the right source) |
Unsupported legal statements | Flagged in the answer | Flagging not documented |
Features compared
Criterion | Jurata® Legal Agent | Justement |
|---|---|---|
Research modes | Fast, answering in around 15 seconds, and Deep Agent for multi-step research | One assistant with six selectable tasks; separate research modes not documented |
Follow-up questions on unclear facts | Structured questions with choices, suggested answers or form fields before the agent continues its research | Shows what is still missing when preparing the facts; structured follow-up questions not documented |
Deadline calculator | Deadlines in days or months, with the public holidays of all 26 cantons and court holidays | Deadline calculation as a step of the assistant, including suspension of time limits (demo step ‘calculate deadline’); consideration of cantonal public holidays not documented |
Commercial register | Zefix lookup including authorised signatories based on SOGC publications; in the Word Add-in also a check of the companies named in the document | Zefix lookup in the assistant, with SOGC publications where needed to clarify signing authority |
Skills | Your own instructions saved as skills, shareable with the team and available in any chat by typing ‘/’; plus skills prepared by Jurata | Six predefined tasks (e.g. draft a legal submission, review an appeal); own instructions not documented |
Own knowledge base (Library) | Upload your own documents once and use them in every chat, personally or as a team | No permanent document storage; documents are attached to a conversation |
Dossiers | Dossiers group the chats and documents of a matter; findings from earlier chats feed into new chats (case memory) | Documents are attached to a single conversation; according to the provider, neither a document store nor an archive |
Conversation retention | Stored encrypted until you delete them | Deleted automatically by default, currently no later than 30 days after the last input; export possible |
Word editor | Integrated Word editor in the Workbench: fully equivalent to Microsoft Word, the file format (.docx) is preserved 100 %; with tracked changes, comments, styles, numbering, table of contents and spell check | Editable document in the assistant with versions, marked and explained changes and comments; download as Word (.docx), PDF or Markdown. Styles, table of contents, spell check and preservation of the .docx format not documented |
Drafting from templates | In the Word Add-in: personal and team templates (.docx); the agent chooses the right template and applies it | Not mentioned in the Word Add-in description |
Automatic document review | In the Word Add-in: findings on terminology, cross-references, consistency, completeness, legal accuracy and ambiguity, with one-click correction | In the Word Add-in: citations checked at the source; in the assistant, substantive review on request (e.g. ‘analyse document’, ‘review appeal’); automatic background review not documented |
Languages | German, French, Italian, English (interface and answers) | German, French, Italian, English (interface and answers); one-click translation of sources |
Company and support
Criterion | Jurata® Legal Agent | Justement |
|---|---|---|
Team | around 15 employees | One person: the founder runs and develops the service and answers questions (according to the provider) |
Support | By email and via a Swiss telephone hotline; response within 24 hours (Entry) or 4 hours (Pro and Max), during business hours | By email; no telephone number and no response times published |
Organisations | Central onboarding and user management, a single invoice, personal introduction and training; team library, team skills and team templates | Invite members by email, admin access; billing to the card on file, invoice for larger organisations on request |
Google reviews | 5.0 stars (492 reviews) | No reviews |
Trustpilot reviews | 4.9 stars (87 reviews) | No Trustpilot profile |
References | Publicly named clients, including die Mobiliar, Protekta Rechtsschutz, Swiss Prime Site and XpertCenter | Two named voices from law firms on the website and over 4000 registered accounts (according to the provider); no client list published |
Focus
Criterion | Jurata® Legal Agent | Justement |
|---|---|---|
Approach | The agent is at the centre: research, document review and drafting, from quick answers to in-depth research with the Deep Agent | The search engine for Swiss legal sources is the starting point, complemented by the Justement Assistant for research, documents and legal submissions |
Suited to | Law firms, legal departments and insurers that want organisation features, a personal introduction and fixed support response times | Lawyers looking for a research platform for Swiss legal sources with an AI assistant |
Conclusion: Jurata® Legal Agent compared with Justement
Justement is a Zurich-based platform for legal research in Swiss law: a search engine for Swiss legal sources, complemented by the Justement Assistant for research, documents and legal submissions. Justement shows the cited and the citing sources for every enactment and decision and discloses its measures for protecting professional secrecy in detail.
The Jurata® Legal Agent automatically checks every statement after every answer with answer validation, groups matters in dossiers with case memory and bases use with client data on a legal opinion by Dr. iur. David Vasella (Walder Wyss). This is complemented by your own skills, a library for your own documents and an integrated Word editor that is fully equivalent to Microsoft Word.
The Jurata® Legal Agent also offers a personal introduction and support with a Swiss telephone hotline and fixed response times. If you want to compare Justement and the Jurata® Legal Agent, test the Jurata® Legal Agent free of charge for 7 days, without a credit card, on your own case.
Compare for yourself.
7 days for free, with full functionality and without a credit card.