Comparison

Jurata® Legal Agent vs. Justement

Justement is a Zurich-based platform for legal research in Swiss law with the AI assistant Justement Assistant. This comparison covers data protection and professional secrecy, legal sources, answer validation, the individual features, and the support and organisational features of both providers. As of October 2026.

Third-party information is sourced from their public websites and documentation.

Data protection and professional secrecy

Criterion

Jurata® Legal Agent

Justement

Data storage

Microsoft Azure in Switzerland, encrypted

In Switzerland on Google Cloud, encrypted

Model inference (language models)

Microsoft Azure in Switzerland and the EU, never in the USA

In Switzerland or the EU, currently in the EU

Subcontractors

Microsoft Azure is the only subcontractor that receives case and client data.

Google Cloud EMEA Ltd is the only directly engaged sub-processor for content data

Training on your data

No, neither by Jurata nor by the LLM provider

No, neither by Justement nor by its cloud provider

Legal opinion on professional secrecy

Legal opinion by Dr. iur. David Vasella (Walder Wyss): use, including with client data and without the client’s consent, complies with professional rules and data protection law (Art. 321 SCC, Art. 13 BGFA, FADP, GDPR)

No external legal opinion published on the website; own legal assessment and answers on the SAV guidelines

Sign-in

Microsoft and Google Single Sign-on or email and password, in all plans

Google or Microsoft Single Sign-on or email and password, for all users

Legal sources and citation graph

Criterion

Jurata® Legal Agent

Justement

Case law

Over 960’000 decisions: federal, cantonal and administrative bodies

Around 935’000 decisions: federal, cantonal and administrative bodies, plus around 98’500 judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Cantonal law

Legislation of the Confederation and all 26 cantons

Legislation of the Confederation and all 26 cantons

Citation graph

Interactive citation graph (Swiss Legal Graph, around 1.5 million nodes, almost 20 million relationships) in 2D or 3D; citations down to paragraph and letter

For every enactment and decision: what it cites and where it is cited, also for individual articles and sections; context network of similar decisions

Appeal history and outcome

The citation graph links judgments to the lower instance and shows whether it was upheld, set aside or amended and how the proceedings ended

Not documented; published BGE decisions are linked to the unpublished Federal Supreme Court version of the same decision

Web search

Integrated web search in addition to the legal sources

No integrated web search (deliberately not used, according to the provider)

Answer validation

Criterion

Jurata® Legal Agent

Justement

Answer validation

Automatically after every answer: each statement is checked against all cited original sources and shown as supported, partly supported or not supported

A click on a citation opens the cited passage; an automatic check of every answer is not documented

Check of every citation

Automatically: each citation is assessed individually as supported, wrong pinpoint, no contribution to the statement or contradicting the statement

As a task or at the push of a button in a document: citations are checked at the source, with reasons for any issues (e.g. wrong pinpoint in the right source)

Unsupported legal statements

Flagged in the answer

Flagging not documented

Features compared

Criterion

Jurata® Legal Agent

Justement

Research modes

Fast, answering in around 15 seconds, and Deep Agent for multi-step research

One assistant with six selectable tasks; separate research modes not documented

Follow-up questions on unclear facts

Structured questions with choices, suggested answers or form fields before the agent continues its research

Shows what is still missing when preparing the facts; structured follow-up questions not documented

Deadline calculator

Deadlines in days or months, with the public holidays of all 26 cantons and court holidays

Deadline calculation as a step of the assistant, including suspension of time limits (demo step ‘calculate deadline’); consideration of cantonal public holidays not documented

Commercial register

Zefix lookup including authorised signatories based on SOGC publications; in the Word Add-in also a check of the companies named in the document

Zefix lookup in the assistant, with SOGC publications where needed to clarify signing authority

Skills

Your own instructions saved as skills, shareable with the team and available in any chat by typing ‘/’; plus skills prepared by Jurata

Six predefined tasks (e.g. draft a legal submission, review an appeal); own instructions not documented

Own knowledge base (Library)

Upload your own documents once and use them in every chat, personally or as a team

No permanent document storage; documents are attached to a conversation

Dossiers

Dossiers group the chats and documents of a matter; findings from earlier chats feed into new chats (case memory)

Documents are attached to a single conversation; according to the provider, neither a document store nor an archive

Conversation retention

Stored encrypted until you delete them

Deleted automatically by default, currently no later than 30 days after the last input; export possible

Word editor

Integrated Word editor in the Workbench: fully equivalent to Microsoft Word, the file format (.docx) is preserved 100 %; with tracked changes, comments, styles, numbering, table of contents and spell check

Editable document in the assistant with versions, marked and explained changes and comments; download as Word (.docx), PDF or Markdown. Styles, table of contents, spell check and preservation of the .docx format not documented

Drafting from templates

In the Word Add-in: personal and team templates (.docx); the agent chooses the right template and applies it

Not mentioned in the Word Add-in description

Automatic document review

In the Word Add-in: findings on terminology, cross-references, consistency, completeness, legal accuracy and ambiguity, with one-click correction

In the Word Add-in: citations checked at the source; in the assistant, substantive review on request (e.g. ‘analyse document’, ‘review appeal’); automatic background review not documented

Languages

German, French, Italian, English (interface and answers)

German, French, Italian, English (interface and answers); one-click translation of sources

Company and support

Criterion

Jurata® Legal Agent

Justement

Team

around 15 employees

One person: the founder runs and develops the service and answers questions (according to the provider)

Support

By email and via a Swiss telephone hotline; response within 24 hours (Entry) or 4 hours (Pro and Max), during business hours

By email; no telephone number and no response times published

Organisations

Central onboarding and user management, a single invoice, personal introduction and training; team library, team skills and team templates

Invite members by email, admin access; billing to the card on file, invoice for larger organisations on request

Google reviews

5.0 stars (492 reviews)

No reviews

Trustpilot reviews

4.9 stars (87 reviews)

No Trustpilot profile

References

Publicly named clients, including die Mobiliar, Protekta Rechtsschutz, Swiss Prime Site and XpertCenter

Two named voices from law firms on the website and over 4000 registered accounts (according to the provider); no client list published

Focus

Criterion

Jurata® Legal Agent

Justement

Approach

The agent is at the centre: research, document review and drafting, from quick answers to in-depth research with the Deep Agent

The search engine for Swiss legal sources is the starting point, complemented by the Justement Assistant for research, documents and legal submissions

Suited to

Law firms, legal departments and insurers that want organisation features, a personal introduction and fixed support response times

Lawyers looking for a research platform for Swiss legal sources with an AI assistant

Conclusion: Jurata® Legal Agent compared with Justement

Justement is a Zurich-based platform for legal research in Swiss law: a search engine for Swiss legal sources, complemented by the Justement Assistant for research, documents and legal submissions. Justement shows the cited and the citing sources for every enactment and decision and discloses its measures for protecting professional secrecy in detail.

The Jurata® Legal Agent automatically checks every statement after every answer with answer validation, groups matters in dossiers with case memory and bases use with client data on a legal opinion by Dr. iur. David Vasella (Walder Wyss). This is complemented by your own skills, a library for your own documents and an integrated Word editor that is fully equivalent to Microsoft Word.

The Jurata® Legal Agent also offers a personal introduction and support with a Swiss telephone hotline and fixed response times. If you want to compare Justement and the Jurata® Legal Agent, test the Jurata® Legal Agent free of charge for 7 days, without a credit card, on your own case.

Compare for yourself.

7 days for free, with full functionality and without a credit card.

Frequently asked questions about the comparison

What is the difference between the Jurata® Legal Agent and Justement?

Do both providers store data in Switzerland?

May I enter client data?